Compare the Relationship Between Carrying Capacity and Limiting Factors. << Read Less

Maximum population size of a species that an environs tin support indefinitely

The carrying capacity of an surround is the maximum population size of a biological species that can be sustained by that specific surround, given the nutrient, habitat, h2o, and other resource bachelor. The conveying capacity is defined as the environment'south maximal load, which in population ecology corresponds to the population equilibrium, when the number of deaths in a population equals the number of births (as well as clearing and emigration). The effect of carrying capacity on population dynamics is modelled with a logistic part. Conveying capacity is practical to the maximum population an surround can back up in ecology, agronomics and fisheries. The term carrying capacity has been practical to a few different processes in the by before finally being applied to population limits in the 1950s.^[ane] The notion of carrying capacity for humans is covered past the notion of sustainable population.

At the global calibration, scientific data indicates that humans are living across the carrying capacity of planet Earth and that this cannot continue indefinitely. This scientific evidence comes from many sources simply is presented in particular in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, in ecological footprint accounts,^[2] or planetary boundaries research.^[3] An early on detailed test of global limits was published in the 1972 book Limits to Growth, which has prompted follow-up commentary and analysis.^[4] A 2012 review in Nature past 22 international researchers expressed concerns that the Earth may be "approaching a country shift" in its biosphere.^[5]

Origins [edit]

In terms of population dynamics, the term 'carrying capacity' was not explicitly used in 1838 by the Belgian mathematician Pierre François Verhulst when he get-go published his equations based on research on modelling population growth.^[6]

The origins of the term "carrying capacity" are uncertain, with sources variously stating that it was originally used "in the context of international shipping" in the 1840s,^{[seven] [8]} or that it was kickoff used during 19th-century laboratory experiments with micro-organisms.^[9] A 2008 review finds the get-go use of the term in English was an 1845 report by the US Secretary of State to the United states Senate. It then became a term used generally in biological science in the 1870s, being nearly developed in wild animals and livestock management in the early 1900s.^[8] It had go a staple term in ecology used to define the biological limits of a natural organisation related to population size in the 1950s.^{[7] [viii]}

Neo-Malthusians and eugenicists popularised the use of the words to draw the number of people the Earth tin back up in the 1950s,^[eight] although American biostatisticians Raymond Pearl and Lowell Reed had already applied it in these terms to human populations in the 1920s.^{[ commendation needed ]}

Hadwen and Palmer (1923) defined conveying chapters equally the density of stock that could be grazed for a definite period without harm to the range.^{[10] [11]}

It was showtime used in the context of wildlife direction by the American Aldo Leopold in 1933, and a year subsequently by the also American Paul Lester Errington, a wetlands specialist. Both used the term in different ways, Leopold largely in the sense of grazing animals (differentiating between a 'saturation level', an intrinsic level of density a species would live in, and conveying chapters, the virtually animals which could be in the field) and Errington defining 'conveying capacity' as the number of animals higher up which predation would become 'heavy' (this definition has largely been rejected, including by Errington himself).^{[10] [12]} The important and popular 1953 textbook on ecology by Eugene Odum, Fundamentals of Environmental, popularised the term in its modern meaning as the equilibrium value of the logistic model of population growth.^{[10] [13]}

Mathematics [edit]

The specific reason why a population stops growing is known as a limiting or regulating gene.^{[ citation needed ]}

Reaching carrying chapters through a logistic growth curve

The difference betwixt the birth rate and the death charge per unit is the natural increase. If the population of a given organism is below the carrying chapters of a given environment, this environment could support a positive natural increase; should it discover itself above that threshold the population typically decreases.^[xiv] Thus, the conveying capacity is the maximum number of individuals of a species that an environment tin support.^[xv]

Population size decreases to a higher place carrying capacity due to a range of factors depending on the species concerned, but can include bereft space, food supply, or sunlight. The conveying capacity of an environment may vary for dissimilar species.^{[ citation needed ]}

In the standard ecological algebra equally illustrated in the simplified Verhulst model of population dynamics, carrying capacity is represented by the constant G:

${\displaystyle {\frac {dN}{dt}}=rN\left(i-{\frac {North}{K}}\correct)}$

where

N is the population size,

r is the intrinsic growth charge per unit

K is the carrying chapters of the local environment, and

dN/dt , the derivative of Due north with respect to fourth dimension t, is the rate of change in population with time.

Thus, the equation relates the growth rate of the population N to the electric current population size, incorporating the consequence of the two abiding parameters r and M. (Note that decrease is negative growth.) The choice of the letter of the alphabet K came from the German Kapazitätsgrenze (capacity limit).

This equation is a modification of the original Verhulst model:

${\displaystyle {\frac {dN}{dt}}=rN-\blastoff N^{two}}$ ^[16]

In this equation, the carrying capacity Chiliad, ${\displaystyle N^{*}}$ , is

${\displaystyle North^{*}={\frac {r}{\alpha }}.}$

This is a graph of the population due to the logistic curve model. When the population is above the carrying capacity it decreases, and when information technology is below the conveying capacity it increases.

When the Verhulst model is plotted into a graph, the population modify over time takes the grade of a sigmoid curve, reaching its highest level at K. This is the logistic growth curve and information technology is calculated with:

${\displaystyle f(10)={\frac {L}{one+e^{-k(ten-x_{0})}}},}$

where

east is the natural logarithm base (besides known every bit Euler's number),

x ₀ is the x value of the sigmoid'southward midpoint,

L is the curve'south maximum value,

K is the logistic growth charge per unit or steepness of the curve ^[17] and

${\displaystyle f(x_{0})=L/ii.}$

The logistic growth curve depicts how population growth rate and the carrying capacity are inter-connected. As illustrated in the logistic growth curve model, when the population size is small, the population increases exponentially. However, equally population size nears the carrying capacity, the growth decreases and reaches naught at One thousand.^[eighteen]

What determines a specific organisation'due south carrying capacity involves a limiting factor which may be something such every bit available supplies of food, water, nesting areas, space or amount of waste that tin exist absorbed. Where resources are finite, such equally for a population of Osedax on a whale fall or bacteria in a petridish, the population will bend dorsum downwards to zero after the resource take been wearied, with the bend reaching its apogee at K. In systems in which resources are constantly replenished, the population will reach its equilibrium at Yard.^{[ citation needed ]}

Software is available to assist calculate the carrying chapters of a given natural surround.^[19]

Population environmental [edit]

Carrying capacity is a commonly used method for biologists when trying to better empathize biological populations and the factors which bear upon them.^[1] When addressing biological populations, conveying capacity can be used as a stable dynamic equilibrium, taking into account extinction and colonization rates.^[xiv] In population biology, logistic growth assumes that population size fluctuates higher up and below an equilibrium value.^[xx]

Numerous authors accept questioned the usefulness of the term when applied to actual wild populations.^{[x] [11] [21]} Although useful in theory and in laboratory experiments, the use of carrying capacity equally a method of measuring population limits in the environment is less useful as it assumes no interactions betwixt species.^[fourteen]

Agronomics [edit]

Calculating the carrying chapters of a paddock in Australia is washed in Dry Sheep Equivalents (DSEs). A unmarried DSE is 50 kg Merino wether, dry ewe or non-pregnant ewe, which is maintained in a stable status. Not only sheep are calculated in DSEs, the carrying capacity for other livestock is also calculated using this measure. A 200 kg weaned calf of a British mode breed gaining 0.25 kg/day is five.5DSE, but if the aforementioned weight of the same blazon of dogie were gaining 0.75 kg/day, it would be measure at 8DSE. Cattle are not all the same, their DSEs can vary depending on breed, growth rates, weights, if it is a cow ('dam'), steer or ox ('bullock' in Commonwealth of australia), and if it weaning, significant or 'wet' (i.e. lactating). It is of import for farmers to calculate the carrying capacity of their land so they can establish a sustainable stocking rate.^[22] In other parts of the world different units are used for calculating carrying capacities. In the United Kingdom the paddock is measured in LU, livestock units, although different schemes exist for this.^{[23] [24]} New Zealand uses either LU,^[25] EE (ewe equivalents) or SU (stock units).^[26] In the USA and Canada the traditional system uses animal units (AU).^[27] A French/Swiss unit is Unité de Gros Bétail (UGB).^{[28] [29]}

In some European countries such as Switzerland the pasture (alm or alp) is traditionally measured in Stoß, with one Stoß equalling four Füße (anxiety). A more modern European system is Großvieheinheit (GV or GVE), corresponding to 500 kg in liveweight of cattle. In extensive agriculture 2 GV/ha is a mutual stocking charge per unit, in intensive agriculture, when grazing is supplemented with actress fodder, rates can be v to 10 GV/ha.^{[ citation needed ]} In Europe average stocking rates vary depending on the land, in 2000 the Netherlands and Belgium had a very rate of iii.82 GV/ha and 3.nineteen GV/ha respectively, surrounding countries have rates of around 1 to 1.5 GV/ha, and more than southern European countries have lower rates, with Spain having the lowest rate of 0.44 GV/ha.^[30] This system can also be applied to natural areas. Grazing megaherbivores at roughly 1 GV/ha is considered sustainable in central European grasslands, although this varies widely depending on many factors. In ecology it is theoretically (i.e. circadian succession, patch dynamics, Megaherbivorenhypothese) taken that a grazing pressure of 0.3 GV/ha past wild animals is enough to hinder afforestation in a natural area. Because different species accept unlike ecological niches, with horses for example grazing short grass, cattle longer grass, and goats or deer preferring to browse shrubs, niche differentiation allows a terrain to take slightly higher carrying capacity for a mixed group of species, than information technology would if there were just one species involved.^{[ commendation needed ]}

Some niche market schemes mandate lower stocking rates than can maximally be grazed on a pasture. In order to market ones' meat products as 'biodynamic', a lower Großvieheinheit of one to 1.five (2.0) GV/ha is mandated, with some farms having an operating structure using only 0.5 to 0.8 GV/ha.^{[ commendation needed ]}

The Food and Agriculture Organization has introduced iii international units: FAO Livestock Units for North America,^{[31] [32]} FAO Livestock Units for sub-Saharan Africa,^{[31] [32]} and Tropical Livestock Units.^[33]

Another rougher and less precise method of determining the carrying capacity of a paddock is simply by looking objectively at the condition of the herd. In Australia, the national standardized organisation for rating livestock weather condition is washed by body condition scoring (BCS). An animal in a very poor status is scored with a BCS of 0, and an animal which is extremely salubrious is scored at 5: animals may be scored between these ii numbers in increments of 0.25. At least 25 animals of the aforementioned type must be scored to provide a statistically representative number, and scoring must take place monthly -if the average falls, this may be due to a stocking charge per unit to a higher place the paddock's carrying chapters or too little forage. This method is less direct for determining stocking rates than looking at the pasture itself, considering the changes in the status of the stock may lag behind changes in the condition of the pasture.^[22]

Fisheries [edit]

A fishery at dusk in Cochin, Kerala, India.

In fisheries, the carrying chapters is used in the formulae to calculate sustainable yields for fisheries direction.^[34] The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is divers as "the highest boilerplate catch that can be continuously taken from an exploited population (=stock) under average environmental weather condition". It was originally calculated equally half of the carrying chapters, but has been refined over the years,^[35] now being seen every bit roughly 30% of the population, depending on the species or population.^{[36] [37]} Considering the population of a species which is brought below its carrying capacity due to line-fishing will find itself in the exponential phase of growth, as seen in the Verhulst model, the harvesting of an corporeality of fish at or below MSY is a surplus yield which tin be sustainably harvested without reducing population size at equilibrium, keeping the population at its maximum recruitment (however, annual angling can be seen as a modification of r in the equation -i.due east. the environment has been modified, which means that the population size at equilibrium with almanac angling is slightly below what K would be without it). Note that mathematically and in practical terms, MSY is problematic. If mistakes are fabricated and even a tiny amount of fish are harvested each year above the MSY, populations dynamics imply that the total population volition eventually subtract to zero. The actual carrying capacity of the surroundings may fluctuate in the real world, which means that practically, MSY may actually vary slightly from year to yr^{[38] [39] [forty]} (annual sustainable yields and maximum average yield attempt to take this into account).^{[ citation needed ]} Other similar concepts are optimum sustainable yield and maximum economical yield, these are both harvest rates below MSY.^{[41] [42]}

These calculations are used to determine fishing quotas.^{[ commendation needed ]}

Humans [edit]

Every bit climate change becomes a bigger outcome, it has moved from social and natural sciences to political debates.^[43] Carrying chapters currently tends to be thought of equally a natural and normal residuum between nature and humans. Carrying chapters depends on the amount of natural resource available to a population and how much of the resource is needed. When it began to be used, information technology looked at human impacts on the environment or specific species. Anthropological criticisms of the concept of carrying chapters are that information technology does not successfully capture the nuances of how multilayered human and environment relationships are. Discussions of conveying capacity often utilize a framework that places undue arraign on populations that oft feel the worse effects of climate change and environmental degradation. The Gwembe Tonga Research Project (GTRP) is a long term study in Africa, that uses the building of the Kariba Dam on the Zambezi River as a case written report to explore the effects of large scale development on populations. The edifice of this dam and the subsequent flooding in the expanse displaced 57,000 people.^[43] Increasing drought cycles along with displaced people joining state that was already populated caused a great deal of precarity for the displaced population, and kinship networks and famine foods were utilized to deal with scarcity. The study was started in 1956. It originally wrapped upwardly in 1962, but the researchers chose to proceed indefinitely to better empathise the customs and how it changes over time.^[43] The population was resettled from development on Lake Kariba. Some of the villages were forced to settle below the new dam. Vi g people settled in Lusitu, with very ethnically different people with around one thousand people and a new surround. Droughts in the area are becoming more frequent, and in that location are definitely some ecology costs. However, with GTRP, it has been found that there is no inevitable permanent damage to the environmental. In Lusitu, there was a terrible drought betwixt 1994 and 1995, which resulted in no harvest.^[43] However, the side by side twelvemonth, the people saw a good harvest. It was not enough for the whole population, just it was meliorate than other years. The drought immune the soil to rest, and lead to a bigger harvest than in recent years. The economy has been struggling since the copper industry collapsed in the 1970s.

For years, researchers have attempted to measure human carrying capacity with numbers, but there is non a model that works for every boondocks, metropolis, or country. Some of the issues that cause this are as follows^[43]

1. an assumption of equilibrium
2. difficulty in measuring food amounts
3. disability to take into business relationship preferences in gustation and corporeality of labor
4. assumption of full utilise of food resource
5. assumption of similarity beyond landscapes
6. assumption that the customs is isolated
7. not fully taking into consideration short- and long-term changes
8. does not address the standard of living

When applying carrying capacity to human populations, these eight issues should exist considered. Carrying capacity assumes equilibrium, as well equally it's hard to measure nutrient sources. Not all foods are available all the time, and there is a lot of variation in what is enough, as calories might exist privileged over nutritional value, and it's non possible to business relationship for human preferences. It also assumes that there is total employ of nutrient resource, which doesn't account for those aforementioned preferences or maybe cultural taboos or lack of noesis. In that location are besides choices of when and where labor is invested, and these may differ generationally or across subsets of a population, as needs and goals touch priorities in dissimilar ways. Conveying capacity also assumes homogeneity across a landscape, and that regions don't accept a huge degree of variation and microcosms. It also assumes populations and groups are isolated, and ignores the utilization of practices like support from kinship networks or migration. Other bug with carrying capacity are that it takes a historical view and ignores natural fluctuations, as well as it doesn't accost bug specifically relevant to human populations, like a standard of living. The balance betwixt populations that conveying capacity intends to reflect is more variable and complex than tin can be analyzed but by this concept. Some recent scientists believe that humans are constantly adaptable, so there is no limitation that would completely wipe them out. Others think that humans overusing resources will subtract the conveying capacity overall.^[43]

Meet likewise [edit]

• Tourism carrying capacity
• Inflection bespeak
• Optimum population
• Overpopulation in wild fauna
• Overshoot (population)
• Population ecology
• Population growth
• r/K selection theory
• Toxic chapters
• ecological footprint and biocapacity

Farther reading [edit]

• Kin, Cheng Sok, et al. "Predicting World's Carrying Chapters of Man Population equally the Predator and the Natural Resources as the Casualty in the Modified Lotka-Volterra Equations with Time-dependent Parameters." arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05002 (2019).

References [edit]

1. ^ ^{a b} Chapman, Eric J.; Byron, Carrie J. (January 2018). "The flexible application of carrying chapters in ecology". Global Ecology and Conservation. 13: e00365. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2017.e00365.
2. ^ Mathis Wackernagel, Niels B. Schulz, Diana Deumling, Alejandro Callejas Linares, Martin Jenkins, Valerie Kapos, Republic of chad Monfreda, Jonathan Loh, Norman Myers, Richard Norgaard, and Jørgen Randers, 2002, Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economic system, PNAS July ix, 2002 99 (fourteen) 9266-9271; https://doi.org/x.1073/pnas.142033699
3. ^ Garver K (2011) "A Framework for Novel and Adaptive Governance Approaches Based on Planetary Boundaries" Colorado State Academy, Colorado Conference on Globe System Governance, 17–20 May 2011.
4. ^ Turner, Graham (2008) "A comparison of The Limits to Growth with 30 years of reality" Archived 28 Nov 2010 at the Wayback Machine Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Inquiry Arrangement (CSIRO) Sustainable Ecosystems.
5. ^ Barnosky, AD; Hadly, EA; et al. (2012). "Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere". Nature. 486 (7401): 52–58. Bibcode:2012Natur.486...52B. doi:10.1038/nature11018. hdl:10261/55208. PMID 22678279. S2CID 4788164.
6. ^ Verhulst, Pierre-François (1838). "Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement" (PDF). Correspondance Mathématique et Physique. 10: 113–121. Retrieved iii December 2014.
7. ^ ^{a b} Berkshire encyclopedia of sustainability. Smashing Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group. 2010–2012. ISBN978-one-933782-01-0. OCLC 436221172.
8. ^ ^{a b c d} Sayre, N. F. (2008). "The Genesis, History, and Limits of Carrying Chapters". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 98 (one): 120–134. doi:10.1080/00045600701734356. JSTOR 25515102. S2CID 16994905.
9. ^ Zimmerer, Karl S. (1994). "Human Geography and the "New Ecology": The Prospect and Promise of Integration" (PDF). Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 84: 108–125. doi:ten.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01731.10.
10. ^ ^{a b c d} Dhondt, André A. (January 1988). "Carrying capacity - a confusing concept". Acta Oecologica. 9 (4): 337–346. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
11. ^ ^{a b} McLeod, Steven R. (September 1997). "Is the Concept of Carrying Capacity Useful in Variable Environments?". Oikos. 79 (3): 529–542. doi:10.2307/3546897. JSTOR 3546897.
12. ^ Leopold, Aldo (1933). Game Direction. New York: Charles Sccribener's Sons. p. 51.
13. ^ Odum, Eugene P. (1959). Fundamentals of Environmental (2nd ed.). Philadelphia and London: West. B. Saunders Co. pp. 183-188. ISBN9780721669410. OCLC 554879.
14. ^ ^{a b c} Storch, David; Okie, Hashemite kingdom of jordan Chiliad. (October 2019). "The carrying chapters for species richness". Global Ecology and Biogeography. 28 (x): 1519–1532. doi:10.1111/geb.12987. S2CID 202026304.
15. ^ Rees, William Eastward. (October 1992). "Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying chapters: what urban economic science leaves out". Environment and Urbanization. 4 (2): 121–130. doi:10.1177/095624789200400212.
16. ^ Verhulst, Pierre-François (1838). "Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement" (PDF). Correspondance Mathématique et Physique. x: 113–121. Retrieved 3 December 2014.
17. ^ Verhulst, Pierre-François (1845). "Recherches mathématiques sur la loi d'accroissement de la population" [Mathematical Researches into the Law of Population Growth Increment]. Nouveaux Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles. eighteen: 1–42. Retrieved 2013-02-xviii .
18. ^ Swafford, Angela Lynn. "Logistic Population Growth: Equation, Definition & Graph." Study.com. N.p., xxx May 2015. Web. 21 May 2016. "Logistic Population Growth - Boundless Open Textbook." Boundless. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2016.
19. ^ Martire, Salvatore; Castellani, Valentina; Sala, Serenella (2015). "Conveying capacity assessment of wood resources: Enhancing ecology sustainability in free energy production at local calibration". Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 94: 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.xi.002.
20. ^ Seidl, Irmi; Tisdell, Clem A (Dec 1999). "Carrying capacity reconsidered: from Malthus' population theory to cultural carrying chapters" (PDF). Ecological Economics. 31 (3): 395–408. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00063-4.
21. ^ Hui, C (2006). "Carrying capacity, population equilibrium, and environment's maximal load". Ecological Modelling. 192 (one–2): 317–320. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.001.
22. ^ ^{a b} "4 - Determine carrying capacity and stocking rate". More Beef from Pastures. Meat & Livestock Australia Limited. 2019. Retrieved xiv March 2021.
23. ^ Chesterton, Chris, Revised Calculation of Livestock Units for Higher Level Stewardship Agreements, Technical Advice Notation 33 (2d edition), Rural Development Service, 2006 Archived June 26, 2007, at the Wayback Auto
24. ^ Cipher, J. 2009. Farm Management Purse. 39th Ed. Corby: The Andersons Center.
25. ^ New Zealand Livestock Units on Ruralfind Archived 2010-05-25 at the Wayback Machine
26. ^ Cornforth, I Due south and Sinclair, A G, Fertiliser Recommendations for Pastures and Crops in New Zealand, second Ed (New Zealand Ministry building of Agriculture, Wellington, New Zealand, 1984), quoted in A History of the Stock Unit of measurement System, New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture Archived 2010-05-23 at the Wayback Machine
27. ^ Jasper Womach, Report for Congress: Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-02-12. Retrieved 2011-12-10 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally title (link)
28. ^ Coefficients de conversion des animaux en unités de gros bétail (French): Conversion factors for livestock units.
29. ^ La Commission Européen: Agriculture et Environnement (French) Archived 2010-01-02 at the Wayback Machine European Commission, Agriculture and Environment (English version).
30. ^ peak agrar 11/2001, o.n.A.
31. ^ ^{a b} "P Chilonda and J Otte, Indicators to monitor trends in livestock product at national, regional and international levels, Livestock Research for Rural Evolution, 18 (8), 2006, Article #117".
32. ^ ^{a b} "Compendium of Agronomical-Ecology Indicators, Annexe 2: Definitions, Food and Agriculture Organization of the Un (includes different values for various regions)" (PDF).
33. ^ FAO paper almost Tropical Livestock Units Archived 2011-02-23 at the Wayback Auto
34. ^ Quinn, Terrance J. (28 June 2008). "Ruminations on the evolution and future of population dynamics models in fisheries". Natural Resource Modeling. xvi (4): 341–392. doi:x.1111/j.1939-7445.2003.tb00119.ten.
35. ^ Tsikliras, Athanassios C.; Froese, Rainer (2019). "Maximum Sustainable Yield". Encyclopedia of Environmental (2d ed.). Elsevier. pp. 108–115. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-ix.10601-3. ISBN9780444641304. S2CID 150025979.
36. ^ Bousquet, N.; Duchesne, T.; Rivest, L.-P. (2008). "Redefining the maximum sustainable yield for the Schaefer population model including multiplicative ecology noise" (PDF). Periodical of Theoretical Biology. 254 (1): 65–75. Bibcode:2008JThBi.254...65B. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.025. PMID 18571675.
37. ^ Thorpe, R.B.; LeQuesne, W.J.F.; Luxford, F.; Collie, J.S.; Jennings, S. (2015). "Evaluation and management implications of uncertainty in a multispecies size-structured model of population and community responses to fishing". Methods in Ecology and Evolution. half-dozen (one): 49–58. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12292. PMC4390044. PMID 25866615.
38. ^ Milner-Gulland, E.J., Mace, R. (1998), Conservation of biological resources Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-86542-738-9
39. ^ Larkin, P. A. (1977). "An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield". Transactions of the American Fisheries Lodge. 106 (1): i–11. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1977)106<1:AEFTCO>2.0.CO;two.
40. ^ Botsford, L.W.; Castilla, J.C.; Peterson, C.H. (1997). "The management of fisheries and marine ecosystems". Scientific discipline. 277 (5325): 509–515. doi:ten.1126/science.277.5325.509.
41. ^ Clark, C.Due west. (1990), Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York
42. ^ National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 1996. Our Living Oceans: Study on the Status of U.S. Living Marine Resources 1995. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS0F/SPO-19. NMFS, Silver Springs, Md.
43. ^ ^{a b c d e f} Cliggett, Lisa. "Carrying Capacity's New Guise". The Environment in Anthropology. two: 11–101.

adamswituessarks.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrying_capacity